If any of you have been following the forums since launch, you may have noticed a lot of requests and questions around FBX importing. We are happy to let you know that FBX Importer is coming soon. It is always our intention to focus on the most important challenges that you and other developers are facing. Please keep the suggestions coming, and stay tuned for more details about the FBX Importer.
Update 02/17/2016 (from blog post ): “We are soon releasing a new FBX importer, built entirely from scratch, to make it easier for artists to bring content into Lumberyard (including customers who are fans of tools like Blender). Our next release will support single meshes and materials, and we’ll follow up with support for multi-mesh, skins, skeletons, and animations. Additionally, since we know that many game teams rely on their own proprietary formats, we’ve also built an abstraction layer alongside the
FBX importer that enables you to extend the input format to suit your own team’s needs.”
Thanks, will there be a .DAE importer too? The .FBX SDK isn’t simple to work with and cross compatability between other programs can be problematic some times.
I’ve always wanted to use CryEngine, being a Modo user that wasn’t possible. I look forward to seeing this FBX pipeline in Lumberyard! Just FYI: Modo 903(coming soon) will support FBX 2014.
It is great to see that the devs are listening. Already this and the forum reorganization are wonderful examples of your teams desire to support the community. Keep it up.
The FBX importer is a great idea compared to the current offering, although after speaking with fellow game devs it might not be the best choice for LY in the long term. Since it’s a closed format it limits what contributions can be made to it. The Blender team has spoken of removing it in one of the next releases. Maybe a better choice would be embracing an open exchange format that was specifically developed for game development, something like Xbuf, OpenGEX or glTF. If LY were to embrace one of these formats it would be better for developers in the long term working with non-Autodesk software and one less chokehold that Autodesk has on the industry. OpenGEX and glTF formats have support within the DCC community and from what I can tell xbuf is similar in design to what LY team is looking for input format extensions.
I
totally disagree. FBX is thee best choice for LY in the short or long term. So what if it’s a closed format? Everyone modern DCC app has FBX import/export(Modo ,Valve’s Hammer 2014 editor,even Zbrush support FBX). The dev game world does not revolve around Blender, it does revolve around FBX(like it or not). Epic Games gave 10,000 USD to the Blender Foundation to implement a
working FBX exporter for UE4, maybe they shouldn’t bite the hand that feeds them?